Sunday, January 24, 2021

Windows 10 File and Folder Tag Tool Reviews: Local and Network File and Folder Tagging

 

Seeking a tool to manage tagging of network and local files and folders rendered in a clean and simple UI in short I reviewed tools to Tag Files in Windows 10. Below are notes of my usage, not exhaustive only summarizing my experience wit each as applicable to my use case: A stable, clean and reluabel tool to tag local and network files and folder in Windows 10; Here is what I found

Reference:

https://turbofuture.com/computers/Whats-the-Best-Software-for-Tagging-Files-A-Review

TABBLE : ($)

              UI is TOO busy, not intuitive, navigation is NOT natural, Folder items are merged with file items ?

              this tool will require training, help docs, and watching tutorial if you have hours to learn a new app then this may be the tool for you, else if you are looking for a simple and clean tool to tag files Tabble is OVERKILL

              Unable to add network locations! (or it is so un-intuitive that I could not find the feature in the 2 hours of use I performed)

              Score: D

 

Tag Spaces: ($)

              UI is clean however:

              Unable to view folders in item detail >

              Unable to multi select and apply tags!!! ? (Deal breaker)

              Folders are not displayed in item view by default, Tooltip references a “perspective Toolbar” to resolve which does not exist and/or is near impossible to find.

              This app creates extraneous files for tagging: it creates  .ts flder in EVERY folder that I have tagged files in! This is unreasonable for anyone who plans on tagging 1000's of files especially on a NAS!!

              Not worth the $, maybe a scaled back FREE version would be worth it , as it stands the paid version supplies too many unwanted functions for a price point to high.

              SCore: D

Set tags:.  ($)

              UI is 1990s, looks like they added a band aid for cloud drives, UI looks like a VB/MFC app

              On start we get a an immediate prompt asking if we want to create a “facet folder”; what is that?.i

On first app usage we need to hot the help files before doing ANYTHING else. Not a good sign'

              useful tool if you are only tagging local files and folders, NOT useful if you are tagging any NETWORK files.

              Score: C

 

XYExplorer: (Free)

              Stable UI, works fairly well support local and network file and folder tagging. Adding tags, reading tags and managing tags this XnView competitor has clean, intuitive  & stable Tagging interface.

              Rating & Color don’t seem to work (perhaps my config needs a change)

              Is a full featured explorer UI interface, could supplement or even replace windows explorer.

              Tagging is a feature integrated within XyExlorer as a panel, as aforementioned tagging stable, reliable and intuitive.  Multi-Select & tag is enabled

              Score: B

 

             

 

Tag Explorer: (Windows Store, Free)

              clean UI, quick install

              Allows tagging of local & network  files an folders, allows multi select.  Stable, intuitive & clean UI are inviting and simple to navigate and infer flow. If you can use Windows Photos App then this tool will fee similar as the developer seemingly followed Fluent Design UI patterns that we see in MS Photos & other well known Windows Store UWP Apps.

              Stable, does not crash, only slight delay when browsing folder, reading and writing tags. Is fastest app of all tested

              Tag Explorer focuses on tagging and nothing else, is concise with NO frivolous features to cause slows down.

              Features are strictly related to adding tags, reading tags and managing tags,

              network location operate same as local; Folder Management is similar to Windows Photos: Add a Folder, then you can manage tags of items in added folder.

              Score : A

 

If tagging is your goal for single user for network & local files & folders then tag Explorer is the best tool in my opinion. All the other are tools are overkill, unusable or provide features outside the requirements for my Use Case of a single user / power user.

Friday, January 15, 2021

Surface Go Video Editor Comparison Notes

Reference Articles:

https://turbofuture.com/graphic-design-video/3-Free-Video-Editors-for-Slow-Computers

https://thetechtop10.com/10-video-editors-for-weak-computers/ 

Ranking, sorted by least HW requirements first


1. vsdc

2. videoPad

3. videoProc

4. shotcut

5. filmora


Surface Go Video Editor Comparison Notes

After spending far too long reviewing posts on lightweight editors that may work with Surface Go and some Surface Go Specific video editor reviews. I downloaded around 6 editors (per recommended  articles) and executed a similar edit test case for each, including input clips, effects, edits and output. My Surface Go system specs are here 8G RAM, 128 GB HD, 1.61Ghz

Below are a summary of notes & observations, these are merely cliff notes of my experiences, I did not have time to capture every detail. A ubiquitous result was clear, Surface Go does NOT operate with so called light weight editors, instead only 2 editors were near operational for me, Fimora & VideoPad. Editing, scrubbing, program navigation and exporting are near impossible in all other editors.

If anyone else has differing results I would love to know if they deviated from the default editor install settings.

Surface Go Video Editor Comparison Notes,

Render test Summary:

Baseline editor android V405TA, Editor Action Director:

        Project Input: 2 clips 4K 60fps, 3 transitions, 1 title, 2 edit cuts, 2 edit crop

Duration: 01m04s

result: Res: 3840X2160 Rat: 16:9 fps: 60fps Duration: 25s, bitrate: 50Mb/s

vsdc:

Project Setup

Editing, Unable to scrub, Choppy, Unreliable

Export Project: 

Duration: 04m+!!

result: Res: 3840X2160 Rat: 16:9 fps: 30fps bitrate:30Mb/s

videoproc:

Project Setup

is NOT an editor without paying $$

Shotcut:

edit: useless, choppy, delays, scrub, edit, all tools have delay

Export: 3 min to export 25 sec

ActionDirector

Unusable: barely edits

produce: 15 sec (OK)

VideoPad

Project: 80% Useless, Choppy, Delays, Scrubbing Kind of works, 

  Export: Need $ to export 4K

Export: 25 Sec (GOOD) 


Filmora.8.5

1. edit, smooth, not choppy, can scrub OK, some delay in effects, however it is the closest to android. 10X better than the closest VideoPad

2. Export, Slow, 25 sec, 2K clip took over 2 min (140sec) 

3. Export Settings: 


Hardware Requirements Per

vsdc

Windows OS: XP SP3 / Vista / 7 / 8 / 10

Intel, AMD or compatible processor with the working frequency at 1.5 GHz or higher

Screen resolution: 1024x768 pixels with 16-bit color or higher

RAM 512Mb for the video editing software

Microsoft DirectX 9.0с or higher

300 MB of free disk space minimum



shotcut

Operating system: 32- or 64-bit Windows 7 - 10, Apple macOS 10.10 - 10.15, or 64-bit Linux with at least Glibc 2.19.

CPU: x86-64 Intel or AMD; at least one 2 GHz core for SD, 2 cores for HD, and 4 cores for 4K.

GPU: OpenGL 2.0 that works correctly and is compatible. On Windows, you can also use a card with good, compatible DirectX 9 or 11 drivers.

RAM 1. Minimum 4GB RAM for SD Editing 2. 8GB For HD Editin 3. 16GB For 4K Editing

GPU OpenGL 2.0 or DirectX9 or 11

Storage 1 GB Minimum For Installation



videopad

Windows OS 64 bit: 10, XP, Vista, 7, 8 and 8.1

Processor: 1.5 GHz

RAM: 4 GB

Disk space: 100 MB



filora

Operating System Windows- 7/8/8.1/10 (64-bit)

Mac– 10.7 to 10.15

RAM Windows– 4GB Minimum

Mac– 8GB Minimum

CPU Windows– Intel i3 with 2 GHz frequency

Mac– Intel i5 with 2 GHz frequency

GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 700 or later; Intel HD Graphics 5000 or later; AMD Radeon R5 or later.

Hard Disk At Least 10 GB


videoproc

System Requirements

Windows Version Microsoft Windows 7, Windows 8/8.1, Windows 10 or later (32-bit and 64-bit versions supported)

Mac Version Mac OS X Snow Leopard, Lion, Mountain Lion, Mavericks, Yosemite, El Capitan, macOS Sierra, High Sierra, Mojave, Catalina (10.15), Big Sur

Processor 1 GHz Intel® or AMD® processor (Minimum)

RAM 1GB RAM (Recommended: 2GB or above)

Hard Disk Space 200MB of hard-disk space for installation